Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Professor Axelrod's avatar

There’s a fairly fundamental educational engagement strategy here, apart from rote repetition from cram schools or gamification from screen-based learning engines: students find the practical application of knowledge far more interesting and involving than lecture or other “dry” learning. Kinesthetic learning - blending a hands-on experience building Tom’s battlebots or model rockets, with the engineering and applied skills necessary to do that correctly, gives the motivation, gratification, and real-world feedback necessary to do it correctly - and in many cases also a little competition with classmates or rivals from the other team to add a bit of spice.

Expand full comment
Spuds Chudley's avatar

Good stuff. Ramaswamy is a typical example of the downsides of the cram school approach. He never used his hard-earned technical skill to invent anything useful or expand the frontier of human knowledge. Rather, he used his knowledge and credentials to impress investors, and dissuade them from looking too closely at his business model. Henry Ford, who learned engineering by fixing farm equipment, would have despised him.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts